WEIGHING THE EVIDENCE
How did Black people use the petition to emancipate themselves and to seek equal rights?
Antislavery Petitions, 1773–1799
KEY CONTEXT
Beginning in the 1770s, Black men and women, enslaved and free, adopted a new political tool in fighting for their freedom: they submitted written petitions to colonial and state legislatures.
In the years leading up to the Declaration of Independence, colonial legislatures had issued statement after statement insisting on liberty. After winning independence from Britain, new state constitutions celebrated universal rights. The Massachusetts constitution, adopted in 1780, stated that “All men are born free and equal, and have certain natural, essential, and unalienable rights.”
In this political environment, Black petitioners sought relief from the same legislators who had made these lofty statements about liberty and constitutional provisions about rights: they asked the legislators to honor those promises for everyone.
Little is known of Felix, the sole author of a petition submitted to the Massachusetts legislature in 1773 (6.1). Later petitions were often filed by groups, like the eight Black men, all free, who petitioned Massachusetts four years later on behalf of the “great number of Negroes, who are detained in a state of Slavery, in the Bowels of a free & Christian Country” (6.2). One of the authors was the prominent Boston-area activist Prince Hall, who would continue to deploy petitions throughout the eighteenth century, seeking not only abolition but equality as well. When Belinda Sutton sought a pension after fifty years of forced labor, Hall likely drafted her petition as well (see 5.3, p. 213).
In 1779, Nero Brewster and eighteen other men appealed to the New Hampshire legislature to end slavery: “let that custom be abolished, which is not found in nature; reason nor religion” (6.3). In South Carolina, three free men—Thomas Cole, P. B. Matthews, and Matthew Webb—demanded that the state’s lawmakers recognize their citizenship as tax-paying “Free-Men of Colour” (6.5).
While some were free and others enslaved, the petitioners had much in common, seeking their rights by appealing to the very authorities that had long maintained their oppression. Their petitions can be read, too, as collective autobiographies, detailing the experiences and sufferings of generations. They were often produced collaboratively, written out by those who could write and signed by all who were present, often with an X. “[I]s this to Be Rite and justes,” asked the men who petitioned from New Haven, Connecticut, before declaring, “No it murder” (6.4).
In 1797, four formerly enslaved men in Philadelphia, led by Absalom Jones, became the first African Americans to petition at the national level, submitting their grievances to Congress. Two years later, Jones, joined by over seventy signatories, would petition Congress a second time, asserting that slavery violated the nation’s founding documents (6.6).
YOUR TURN
Read the petitions carefully, and consider their use of language. Why have the petitioners chosen these particular words? What is the relationship between the petition and other tools of emancipation, like running away or waging a rebellion? Why were these petitions common during this period? How do you think they advanced the movement to end slavery?
6.1 Felix, Petition to Massachusetts, 1773
Province of the Massachusetts-Bay: To his Excellency THOMAS HUTCHINSON, Esq; Governor; To the Honorable His Majesty’s Council, and
To the Honorable House of Representatives in General Court assembled at Boston, the 6th Day of January, 1773.
The humble PETITION of many Slaves, living in the Town of Boston, and other Towns in the Province is this, namely,
That your Excellency and Honors, and the Honorable the Representatives would be pleased to take their unhappy State and Condition under your wise and just Consideration.
We desire to bless God, who loves Mankind, who sent his Son to die for their Salvation, and who is no Respecter of Persons; that he hath lately put it into the Hearts of Multitudes on both Sides of the Water, to bear our Burthens, some of whom are Men of great Note and Influence; who have pleaded our Cause with Arguments which we hope will have their weight with this Honorable Court.
We presume not to dictate to your Excellency and Honors, being willing to rest our Cause on your Humanity and Justice; yet would beg Leave to say a Word or two on the Subject.
Although some of the Negroes are vicious, (who doubtless may be punished and restrained by the same Laws which are in Force against other of the King’s Subjects) there are many others of a quite different Character, and who, if made free, would soon be able as well as willing to bear a Part in the Public Charges; many of them of good natural Parts, are discreet, sober, honest, and industrious; and may it not be said of many, that they are virtuous and religious, although their Condition is in itself so unfriendly to Religion, and every moral Virtue except Patience. How many of that Number have there been, and now are in this Province, who have had every Day of their Lives imbittered with this most intollerable Reflection, That, let their Behaviour be what it will, neither they, nor their Children to all Generations, shall ever be able to do, or to possess and enjoy any Thing, no, not even Life itself, but in a Manner as the Beasts that perish.
We have no Property! We have no Wives! No Children! We have no City! No Country! But we have a Father in Heaven, and we are determined, as far as his Grace shall enable us, and as far as our degraded contemptuous Life will admit, to keep all his Commandments: Especially will we be obedient to our Masters, so long as God in his sovereign Providence shall suffer us to be holden in Bondage.
It would be impudent, if not presumptuous in us, to suggest to your Excellency and Honors any Law or Laws proper to be made, in relation to our unhappy State, which, although our greatest Unhappiness, is not our Fault; and this gives us great Encouragement to pray and hope for such Relief as is consistent with your Wisdom, Justice, and Goodness.
We think ourselves very happy, that we may thus address the Great and General Court of this Province, which great and good Court is to us, the best Judge, under God, of what is wise, just, and good.
We humbly beg Leave to add but this one Thing more: We pray for such Relief only, which by no Possibility can ever be productive of the least Wrong or Injury to our Masters; but to us will be as Life from the dead.
Signed, F E L I X.
Source: A Lover of Constitutional Liberty, The Appendix: Or, Some Observations on the Expediency of the Petition of the Africans, living in Boston (Boston: E. Russell, n.d.), pp. 9–11.
How does Felix address the court? Why might he request, rather than demand, his freedom?
6.2 Prince Hall et al., Petition to Massachusetts, 1777
To the Honorable Council & House of Representatives for the State of Massachusetts-Bay, in General Court assembled January 13th 1777—
The Petition of a great number of Negroes, who are detained in a state of Slavery, in the Bowels of a free & Christian Country—
Humbly Shewing—
That your Petitioners apprehend that they have, in common with all other Men, a natural & unalienable right to that freedom, which the great Parent of the Universe hath bestowed equally on all Mankind, & which they have never forfeited by any compact or agreement whatever—But they were unjustly dragged, by the cruel hand of Power, from their dearest friends, & some of them even torn from the Embraces of their tender Parents—From a populous, pleasant, & plentiful Country—& in Violation of the Laws of Nature & of Nations & in defiance of all the tender feelings of humanity, brought hither to be sold like Beasts of Burthen, & like them condemned to slavery for Life—Among a People professing the mild Religion of Jesus—A People not insensible of the sweets of rational freedom—nor without Spirit to resent the unjust endeavours of others, to reduce them to a State of Bondage & subjection—Your Honors need not to be informed that a Life of Slavery, like that of your petitioners, deprived of every social privilege, of every thing requisite to render Life even tolerable, is far worse than Non-Existence—In imitation of the laudable example of the good People of these States, your Petitioners have long & patiently waited the event of Petition after Petition, by them presented to the Legislative Body of this State, & cannot but with grief reflect that their success has been but too similar—They cannot but express their astonishment, that it has never been considered, that every principle from which America has acted in the course of her unhappy difficulties with Great-Britain, pleads stronger than a thousand arguments in favor of your Petitioners—They therefore humbly beseech your Honors, to give this Petition its due weight & consideration, & cause an Act of the Legislature to be passed, whereby they may be restored to the enjoyment of that freedom which is the natural right of all Men—& their Children (who were born in this land of Liberty) may not be held as Slaves after they arrive at the age of twenty one Years—So may the Inhabitants of this State (no longer chargeable with the inconsistency of acting, themselves, the part which they condemn & oppose in others) be prospered in their present glorious struggles for Liberty; & have those blessings secured to them by Heaven, of which benevolent minds cannot wish to deprive their fellow-Men.—
And your Petitioners, as in Duty bound shall ever pray —
LANCASTER HILL
JACK PEIRPONT X [his mark]
PETER BESS
NERO FUNILO X [his mark]
BRISTER SLENFEN
NEWPORTSUMNER X [his mark]
PRINCE HALL
JOB LOCK.
Source: Proceedings of the One Hundredth Anniversaryof the Granting of Warrant 459 to African Lodge (Boston: Franklin Press: Rand, Avery, and Company, 1885), pp. 12–13.
What do the petitioners find “astonish[ing]”?
6.3 Nero Brewster et al., Petition to New Hampshire, 1779
To the Honorable, the Council and House of Representatives of said state, now sitting at Exeter, in and for said state:
The petition of the subscribers, natives of Africa, now forcibly detained in slavery in said state most humbly sheweth, That the God of nature gave them life and freedom, upon the terms of the most perfect equality with other men; That freedom is an inherent right of the human species, not to be surrendered, but by consent, for the sake of social life; That private or public tyranny and slavery are alike detestable to minds conscious of the equal dignity of human nature; That in power and authority of individuals, derived solely from a principle of coercion, against the will of individuals, and to dispose of their persons and properties, consists the completest idea of private and political slavery; That all men being ameniable to the Deity for the ill-improvement of the blessings of His Providence, they hold themselves in duty bound strenuously to exert every faculty of their minds to obtain that blessing of freedom, which they are justly entitled to from that donation of the beneficent Creator; That through ignorance and brutish violence of their native countrymen, and by the sinister designs of others (who ought to have taught them better), and by the avarice of both, they, while but children, and incapable of self-defence, whose infancy might have prompted protection, were seized, imprisoned, and transported from their native country, where (though ignorance and unchristianity prevailed) they were born free, to a country where (though knowledge, Christianity and freedom are their boast) they are compelled and their posterity to drag on their lives in miserable servitude; Thus often is the parent’s cheek wet for the loss of a child, torn by the cruel hand of violence from her aching bosom; Thus, often and in vain is the infant’s sigh for the nurturing care of its bereaved parent, and thus do the ties of nature and blood become victims to cherish the vanity and luxury of a fellow mortal. Can this be right? Forbid it gracious Heaven.
Permit again your humble slaves to lay before this honorable assembly some of those grievances which they daily experience and feel. Though fortune hath dealt out our portion with rugged hand, yet hath she smiled in the disposal of our persons to those who claim us as their property; of them we do not complain, but from what authority they assume the power to dispose of our lives, freedom and property; we would wish to know. Is it from the sacred volume of Christianity? There we believe it is not to be found; but here hath the cruel hand of slavery made us incompetent judges, hence knowledge is hid from our minds. Is it from the volumes of the laws? Of these also slaves cannot be judges, but those we are told are founded on reason and justice; it cannot be found there. Is it from the volumes of nature? No, here we can read with others, of this knowledge, slavery cannot wholly deprive us; here we know that we ought to be free agents; here we feel the dignity of human nature; here we feel the passions and desires of men, though checked by the rod of slavery; here we feel a just equality here we know that the God of nature made us free. Is their authority assumed from custom? If so let that custom be abolished, which is not founded in nature; reason nor religion. Should the humanity and benevolence of this honorable assembly restore us that state of liberty of which we have been so long deprived, we conceive that those who are our present masters will not be sufferers by our liberation, as we have most of us spent our whole strength and the prime of our lives in their service; and as freedom inspires a noble confidence and gives the mind an emulation to vie in the noblest efforts of enterprise, and as justice and humanity are the result of your deliberations, we fondly hope that the eye of pity and the heart of justice may commiserate our situation, and put us upon the equality of freemen, and give us an opportunity of evincing to the world our love of freedom by exerting ourselves in her cause, in opposing the efforts of tyranny and oppression over the country in which we ourselves have been so long injuriously enslaved.
Therefore, Your humble slaves most devoutly pray for the sake of injured liberty, for the sake of justice, humanity and the rights of mankind, for the honor of religion and by all that is dear, that your honors would graciously interpose in our behalf, and enact such laws and regulations, as you in your wisdom think proper, whereby we may regain our liberty and be ranked in the class of free agents, and that the name of slave may not more be heard in a land gloriously contending for the sweets of freedom. And your humble slaves as in duty bound will ever pray.
Portsmouth Nov. 12, 1779.
|
Nero Brewster, |
Quam Sherburne, |
|
Seneca Hall, |
Kittridge Tuckerman, |
|
Cesar Gerrish, |
Jack Odiorne, |
|
Winsor Moffatt, |
Romeo Rindge, |
|
Samuel Wentworth, |
Peter Warner, |
|
Peter Frost, |
Zebulon Gardner, |
|
Cipio Hubbard, |
Garrett Cotton, |
|
Pharaoh Rogers, |
Will Clarkson, |
|
Cate Newmarch, |
Prince Whipple. |
|
Pharaoh Shores, |
Source: Granite State Magazine, vol. 4, ed. George Waldo Browne (Manchester, NH: Granite State Publishing, 1907), pp. 200–202.
How do the enslaved Black petitioners question the institution of slavery? What are they demanding?
6.4 “Blacks of New Haven,” Petition to Connecticut, 1788
Our AddreSas
Handed by the Blacks of New Haven City Well wishers of themsels and All mankind
To His Honour and to the Honourrabel Genral Assembly Honoured gentle man will you please-to Lend an eyar to the pooer opprased Africas Blacks that ar now In the Chaine Bondage— Gentlemen please to give The Leave to Give a little Ider of the Crueailtis that we Poore Slaves have to enduir and undergo
1ly—
gentlemen wee are Dragd from our native Country for Life lyis Cruil Slavirre Leving our mothers our farthers our Sisters and our Brothers is this human peaple
2thly
further morgentlemen after wee have Ben and fought the grandest Battles that has Ben fought in this War the greats part of us—We and our children and our Brothers ar takend By [force] of vialince and carred whear thay Suffer an Addisanl Sufrans wher wee ar Beaten and whealmed with Out Eni Cries or with eni Law Gentlemen will is this to Be Rite and justes is this a free contry No it murder
3ly
Gentelmen youwill freerLy allow us a human Bodys anve as a [precious] Sole to Save and how shal we and how shal wee Ever oBtaine that entrest in Jesus Christ for the Lov of our [precious] Soles when ar we to seek it when wee ar a grat meny of us [deprived] of going to the house Gods to at tend pubblick woship or much more larning us our C A B or to reed the Holy BiBle So as to no the word of god
4th
Now gentlemen wee wold wish to act a wisely part and with a mile Temper and good Dispersisan but can we help but Beg for murcy in this accation Don’t gentlemen think us impirtinent for asking this favor for the Lord hath saide ask and it Shal be given1 we that can live prary let you us Live
5th
Now gentelmen we would wish to say nomore apon this Subject all our wishes ar that your Honours would grant us a Liberration wee are all Deturmand we Can toil As Long as thir is Labor we woul wish no more to be in Slavery to Sin Seene Christ is maid us free and nald our [torments] to the Cross and Bought our Liberty
Source: Connecticut Review 17, no. 2, ed. Vincent J. Rosivach (1995): p. 87.
Why do the petitioners mention the experiences of Black soldiers in the Revolutionary War?
6.5 Thomas Cole et al., Petition to South Carolina, 1791
To the Honorable David Ramsay Esquire President and to the rest of the Honorable New Members of the Senate of the State of South Carolina.
The Memorial of Thomas Cole Bricklayer P. B. Mathews and Mathew Webb Butchers on behalf of themselves & others Free-Men of Colour.
Humbly Sheweth
That in the Enumeration of Free Citizens by the Constitution of the United States for the purpose of Representation of the Southern States in Congress Your Memorialists have been considered under that description as part of the Citizens of this State. Although by the Fourteenth and Twenty-Ninth clauses in an Act of Assembly made in the Year 1740 and intitled an Act for the better Ordering and Governing Negroes and other Slaves in this Province commonly called The Negro Act now in force Your Memorialists are deprived of the Rights and Privileges of Citizens by not having it in their power to give Testimony on Oath in prosecutions on behalf of the State from which cause many Culprits have escaped the punishment due to their atrocious Crimes, nor can they give their Testimony in recovering Debts due to them, or in establishing Agreements made by them within the meaning of the Statutes of Frauds and Perjuries in force in this State except in cases where Persons of Colour are concerned, whereby they are subject to great Losses and repeated Injuries without any means of redress.
That by the said clauses in the said Act, they are debarred of the Rights of Free Citizens by being subject to a Trial without the benefit of a Jury and subject to Prosecution by Testimony of Slaves without Oath by which they are placed on the same footing.
Your Memorialists shew that they have at all times since the Independence of the United States contributed and do now contribute to the support of the Government by chearfully (sic) paying their Taxes proportionable to their Property with others who have been during such period, and now are in full enjoyment of the Rights and Immunities of Citizens Inhabitants of a Free Independent State.
That as your Memorialists have been and are considered as Free-Citizens of this State they hope to be treated as such, they are ready and willing to take and subscribe to such Oath of Allegiance to the States as shall be prescribed by this Honorable House, and are also willing to take upon them any duty for the preservation of the Peace in the City . . . or any other occasion if called on.
Your Memorialists do not presume to hope that they shall be put on an equal footing with the Free white citizens of the State in general they only humbly solicit such indulgence as the Wisdom and Humanity of this Honorable House shall dictate in their favor by repealing the clauses the act aforementioned, and substituting such a clause as will efectually (sic) Redress the grievances which your Memorialists humbly submit in this their Memorial but under such restrictions as to your Honorable House shall seem proper.
May it therefore please your Honors to take your Memorialists case into tender consideration, and make such Acts or insert such clauses for the purpose of relieving your Memorialists from the unremitted grievance they now Labour under as in your Wisdom shall seem meet.
And as in duty bound your Memorialists will ever pray
Signed 1st July 1791
Thos Cole
Peter Bassnett Mathewes
Matthew Webb
Source: Journal of Negro History 31, no. 1, ed. Herbert Aptheker (1946): pp. 98–99.
What do the petitioners in this document have in common with enslaved petitioners? What are the differences?
6.6 Absalom Jones et al., Petition to the United States, 1799
To the President, Senate, and House ofRepresentatives.
The Petition of the People of Colour, free men, within the City and Suburbs of Philadelphia, humbly sheweth,
That, thankful to God, our Creator, and to the Government under which we live, for the blessings and benefits granted to us in the enjoyment of our natural right to liberty, and the protection of our persons and property, from the oppression and violence which so great a number of like colour and national descent are subject to, we feel ourselves bound, from a sense of these blessings, to continue in our respective allotments, and to lead honest and peaceable lives, rendering due submission unto the laws, and exciting and encouraging each other thereto, agreeable to the uniform advice of our friends, of every denomination; yet while we feel impressed with grateful sensations for the Providential favour we ourselves enjoy, we cannot be insensible of the condition of our afflicted brethren, suffering under various circumstances, in different parts of these states; but deeply sympathizing with them, are incited by a sense of social duty, and humbly conceive ourselves authorized to address and petition you on their behalf, believing them to be objects of your representation in your public councils, in common with ourselves and every other class of citizens within the jurisdiction of the United States, according to the design of the present Constitution, formed by the General Convention, and ratified in the different states, as set forth in the preamble thereto in the following words, viz. ‘We, the people of the United States, in order to form a more perfect union, establish justice, insure domestic tranquillity, provide for the common defence, and to secure the blessings of liberty to ourselves and posterity, do ordain, &c.’ We apprehend this solemn compact is violated, by a trade carried on in a clandestine manner, to the coast of Guinea, and another equally wicked, practised openly by citizens of some of the southern states, upon the waters of Maryland and Delaware; men sufficiently callous to qualify them for the brutal purpose, are employed in kidnapping those of our brethren that are free, and purchasing others of such as claim a property in them: thus, those poor helpless victims, like droves of cattle, are seized, fettered, and hurried into places provided for this most horrid traffic, such as dark cellars and garrets, as is notorious at Northwest-fork, Chestertown, Eastown, and divers other places. After a sufficient number is obtained, they are forced on board vessels, crouded under hatches, without the least commiseration, left to deplore the sad separation of the dearest ties in nature, husband from wife, and parents from children; thus packed together, they are transported to Georgia and other places, and there inhumanly exposed to sale. Can any commerce, trade, or transaction, so detestably shock the feeling of man, or degrade the dignity of his nature equal to this? And how increasingly is the evil aggravated, when practised in a land high in profession of the benign doctrines of our Blessed Lord, who taught his followers to do unto others as they would they should do unto them. Your petitioners desire not to enlarge, though volumes might be filled with the sufferings of this grossly abused part of the human species, seven hundred thousand of whom, it is said, are now in unconditional bondage in these states: but conscious of the rectitude of our motives in a concern so nearly affecting us, and so effectually interesting to the welfare of this country, we cannot but address you as guardians of our rights, and patrons of equal and national liberties, hoping you will view the subject in an impartial, unprejudiced light. We do not ask for an immediate emancipation of all, knowing that the degraded state of many, and their want of education, would greatly disqualify for such a change; yet, humbly desire you may exert every means in your power to undo the heavy burdens, and prepare the way for the oppressed to go free, that every yoke may be broken. The law not long since enacted by Congress, called the Fugitive Bill,2 is in its execution found to be attended with circumstances peculiarly hard and distressing; for many of our afflicted brethren, in order to avoid the barbarities wantonly exercised upon them, or through fear of being carried off by those men-stealers, being forced to seek refuge by flight, they are then, by armed men, under colour of this law, cruelly treated, or brought back in chains to those that have no claim upon them. In the Constitution and the Fugitive Bill, no mention is made of black people, or slaves; therefore, if the Bill of Rights, or the Declaration of Congress are of any validity, we beseech, that as we are men, we may be admitted to partake of the liberties and unalienable rights therein held forth; firmly believing that the extending of justice and equity to all classes, would be a means of drawing down the blessing of Heaven upon this land, for the peace and prosperity of which, and the real happiness of every member of the community, we fervently pray.
Philadelphia, 30th of December, 1799.
Absalom Jones and others, 73 subscribers.
Source: Remarks on the Slavery of Black People, ed. John Parrish (Philadelphia: Kimber, Conrad, & Co., 1806), pp. 49–51.
On whose behalf do the signers submit their petition? Why don’t they ask for an “immediate emancipation of all”?
Footnotes
- A biblical reference to Matthew 7:7 and Luke 11:9 Return to reference 1
- The Fugitive Slave Act of 1793 Return to reference 2